Jorge Ramirez Martinez v. Kristi Noem, et al
Petitioner: JORGE RAMIREZ MARTINEZ
Respondent: KRISTI L. NOEM, RUSSELL HOTT and BRANDON CROWLEY
Case Number: 26-1065
Filed: January 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Motion to withdraw and dismiss appeal. [ # 9 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [10][7507312] [26-1065] (PS) [Entered: 02/25/2026 12:31 PM]
February 25, 2026 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 02/25/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7507315-2] [7507315] [26-1065] (PS) [Entered: 02/25/2026 12:38 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 9 Motion filed by Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem to dismiss case. [9] [7507161] [26-1065] (Press, Joshua) [Entered: 02/24/2026 10:28 PM]
February 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: In light of the corrected judgment entered by the district court on February 18, 2026, briefing in this appeal will proceed as follows: Appellants brief due on or before 03/25/2026 for Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem. Appellee's brief due on or before 04/24/2026 for Jorge Ramirez Martinez. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/15/2026 for Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem. JXK [7506725] [26-1065] (AD) [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:47 PM]
February 19, 2026 Filing 7 Filed Notice of Entry of Sufficient Judgment by Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem. [7] [7506093] [26-1065] (Press, Joshua) [Entered: 02/19/2026 10:19 PM]
February 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This appeal is REMANDED to the district court to enter a judgment that fully and correctly implements its decision granting habeas corpus relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). This court will retain jurisdiction over this appeal. Once the district court has corrected its judgment, this appeal will proceed to briefing. An amended notice of appeal is unnecessary if the judgment is corrected to reflect what actually happened. Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC , 140 F.4th 839, 848 (7th Cir. 2025) (citing Mosley v. Atchison , 689 F.3d 838, 84243 (7th Cir. 2012)). Appellants shall inform the court, on or before February 19, 2026, whether the district court has entered its corrected judgment. (See order for further details) JXK [6] [7504385] [26-1065] (PS) [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:53 AM]
February 12, 2026 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 02/12/2026 Limited Remand Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7504392-2] [7504392] [26-1065] (PS) [Entered: 02/12/2026 10:00 AM]
January 28, 2026 Filing 5 Filed Response by Appellee Jorge Ramirez Martinez to Court Order of January 14, 2026. [5][7501153] [26-1065] (Osuna, Khiabett) [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:53 PM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 4 Filed Response by Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem to Court order of 01/14/2026. [4][7500904] [26-1065] (Press, Joshua) [Entered: 01/27/2026 11:24 PM]
January 20, 2026 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7499438] [26-1065] (Press, Joshua) [Entered: 01/20/2026 10:44 PM]
January 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellants and appellee each shall file, on or before January 28, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be remanded to the district court to enter a proper judgment. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7498361] [2] [7498361] [26-1065] (PS) [Entered: 01/14/2026 11:29 AM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. U.S. Appeal. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem by 01/20/2026. Appellants' brief due on or before 02/23/2026 for Brandon Crowley, Russell Hott and Kristi L. Noem. Transcript information sheet due by 01/27/2026. [1] [7498335] [26-1065] (CG) [Entered: 01/14/2026 10:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jorge Ramirez Martinez v. Kristi Noem, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JORGE RAMIREZ MARTINEZ
Represented By: Khiabett Tanairi Osuna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KRISTI L. NOEM
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RUSSELL HOTT
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRANDON CROWLEY
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?