Brittny Morrow v. Antonio Mejia, et al
| BRITTNY MORROW, and minor child A.B. |
| FRANKLIN U. VALDERRAMA, ANTONIO MEJIA, JON KUJAWINSKI, OLGA MEJIA and MARTIN MEJIA |
| 26-1131 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The petition is DENIED. The Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. 3771, does not apply to the petitioners. See 18 U.S.C. 3771(e)(2)(A) (defining crime victim as a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia); Jimenez v. Waller, 498 F. App'x 633, 635 (7th Cir. 2012) (per curiam). Further, the petitioners have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief, which is appropriate only in exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power or a clear abuse of discretion. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004). The state court is properly exercising jurisdiction over questions of child custody, and Morrow has not shown that the district court has exceeded its authority or abused its discretion. David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge; Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge and Joshua P. Kolar, Circuit Judge. [3] [7501227] [26-1131] (AP) [Entered: 01/29/2026 08:25 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed Supplemental copy of Exhibit 26 as updated by Petitioner Brittny Morrow. [2] [7500761] [26-1131] (JR) [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/09/2026 for Petitioner Brittny Morrow. [1] [7500492] [26-1131]--[Attached exhibits updated 01/27/2026 by JR.] (CG) [Entered: 01/26/2026 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.