Anton Aseves v. Percy Chester Myers, et al
| ANTON ASEVES |
| PERCY MYERS, Doctor, JOSEPH T. DUDEK, A. DESAI, Nurse Practitioner, NURSE KELLY, Head Nurse, Pinckneyville CC, SERGEANT AGNEW, Pinckneyville CC and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WISCAMP, Pinckneyville CC |
| 26-1139 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Anton Aseves leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 07/08/2026. District Court has assessed a $13.84 initial partial filing fee. [10] [7538700] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 08/10/2026. [26-1139] (CAG) [Entered: 07/09/2026 10:03 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER Re: 1) Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. 2) Plaintiff: Motion to Answer. Upon consideration of the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal, the appellant's motion filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, the district courts order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) certifying that the appeal was filed in bad faith, and the record on appeal, this court has determined that the district court erred in its bad-faith determination. Appellant may be able to raise a non-frivolous argument that the district court erred in dismissing for failure to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The district court is instructed to assess an initial partial filing fee for the appeal and to notify this court when the partial fee has been collected. [ # 7 ] [9] [7537817] VXK [26-1139] (AD) [Entered: 07/06/2026 03:53 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Anton Aseves Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [8] [7517504] [26-1139] (DAB) [Entered: 04/13/2026 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anton Aseves to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7517503] [26-1139] (DAB) [Entered: 04/13/2026 03:13 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion filing fee error, filed on 3/26/2026. Any motion to correct the amount of a fee payment on the district courts docket should be made in the district court. Accordingly, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. CDH [6] [7513634] [26-1139] (FP) [Entered: 03/27/2026 12:52 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anton Aseves regarding filing fee error. [5] [7513511] [26-1139] (EF) [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Anton Aseves leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 03/11/2026. [4] [7510247] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/10/2026. [26-1139] (CAG) [Entered: 03/11/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7507406] [26-1139] (CAG) [Entered: 02/25/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7500743] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [26-1139] (PS) [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Anton Aseves by 02/02/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 02/09/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 02/25/2026. [1] [7500741] [26-1139] (PS) [Entered: 01/27/2026 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
