Miguel Rico v. John Howe
| MIGUEL A. RICO |
| JOHN HOWE |
| 26-1213 |
| February 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $605 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The pro se appellant was DENIED leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis by the appellate court on 04/27/2026 and was given 14 days to pay the $605 filing fee. The pro se appellant has not paid the $605 appellate fee. [9][7528765] [26-1213] (CAG) [Entered: 05/28/2026 08:51 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 05/28/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7528773-2] [7528773] [26-1213] (CAG) [Entered: 05/28/2026 09:01 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: 1. Affidavit accompanying motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 2/19/2026. 2. Memorandum in support of PLRA motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 2/12/2026. 3. Memorandum in support of PLRA motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 2/19/2026. 4. Memorandum in support of PLRA motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 3/13/2026. Upon consideration of appellants motions, the district courts order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) certifying that the appeal was filed in bad faith, and the record on appeal, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. See Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000). The appellant has not identified a good faith argument that the district court erred in dismissing the case. The appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). [ # 7 ] [ # 6 ] [ # 4 ] [ # 5 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3395 8201. [8] [7520804] VXK [26-1213] (FP) [Entered: 04/27/2026 09:28 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Miguel A. Rico Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [7] [7510954] [26-1213] (NHV) [Entered: 03/13/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Miguel A. Rico Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [6] [7506021] [26-1213] (EF) [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Miguel A. Rico to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7506019] [26-1213] (EF) [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Miguel A. Rico Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [4] [7504578] [26-1213] (CAG) [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Miguel A. Rico. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [3] [7504249] [26-1213] (CAG) [Entered: 02/11/2026 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Miguel A. Rico leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/03/2026. [2] [7503886] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/12/2026. [26-1213] (CAG) [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. Date IFP denied: 02/03/2026. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 02/17/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Miguel A. Rico by 02/06/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/04/2026. [1] [7502530] [26-1213] (AD) [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Miguel Rico v. John Howe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MIGUEL A. RICO | |
| Represented By: | Miguel A. Rico |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN HOWE | |
| Represented By: | Frank Henry Bieszczat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
