Cellco Partnership v. City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals
| CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS |
| CITY OF ELKHART BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS |
| 26-1251 |
| February 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/04/2026 for Cellco Partnership. Appellee's brief due on or before 06/12/2026 for City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/10/2026 for Appellant Cellco Partnership. JB [7508280] [26-1251] (HTP) [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:19 PM]
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires the lead attorney and any attorney who intends to present oral argument be admitted to practice in this court. The lead attorney for each party represented by counsel must apply for admission to practice in this court by the later of: (a) 30 days from the docketing of the matter in this court; or (b) 15 days from being retained or appointed as counsel. An attorney who intends to present oral argument must apply for admission to practice in this court before the filing of the appellee's brief. Our records indicate Attorney Rafael P. McLaughlin for Appellee City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals has not been admitted to practice in this court as of this date. The "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit" form can be found at: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/applctn.pdf. The filing of the completed application must be accomplished via the CM/ECF filing system. [10] [7505579] [26-1251] (LJ) [Entered: 02/18/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Rodney W. Carter for party(s) Appellant Cellco Partnership, in case 26-1251 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rodney W. Carter for Appellant Cellco Partnership. [9] [7504232] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1251]--[Edited 02/11/2026 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Carter, Rodney) [Entered: 02/11/2026 02:41 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/02/2026 for Cellco Partnership. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/04/2026 for City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/26/2026 for Appellant Cellco Partnership. JB [7504003] [26-1251] (FP) [Entered: 02/10/2026 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted via Zoom, Monday, March 2, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [7] [7504000] [26-1251] (FP) [Entered: 02/10/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Alex M. Beeman for Appellee City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals. [6] [7503658] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1251]--[Edited 02/10/2026 by FP to reflect that atty. Beeman is added to the docket.] (Beeman, Alexander) [Entered: 02/09/2026 07:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney James C. Remington for Appellant Cellco Partnership. [5] [7503557] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1251][5] [7503557] [26-1251]--[Edited 02/09/2026 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Remington, James) [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Cellco Partnership. [4] [7503486] [26-1251] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 02/09/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joseph S. Diedrich for Appellant Cellco Partnership. [3] [7503484] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1251][3] [7503484] [26-1251]--[Edited 02/09/2026 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 02/09/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Lisa M. Lawless for Appellant Cellco Partnership. [2] [7503480] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1251] (Lawless, Lisa) [Entered: 02/09/2026 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 02/23/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/23/2026 for Cellco Partnership. [1] [7503454] [26-1251] (CG) [Entered: 02/09/2026 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cellco Partnership v. City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS | |
| Represented By: | James C. Remington |
| Represented By: | Rodney W. Carter |
| Represented By: | Lisa M. Lawless |
| Represented By: | Joseph S. Diedrich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF ELKHART BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS | |
| Represented By: | Rafael P. McLaughlin |
| Represented By: | Alexander Maurice Beeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
