Michael Yates v. Karl Hoffman, et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C. YATES
Defendant: KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, ROSLYN HUNEKE and DANIEL L. LAVOIE
Case Number: 26-1274
Filed: February 11, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER re: 1. Motion for extension of time. 2. Motion for appeal to be heard on the original record. [ # 13 ]; Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for recruitment of counsel filed by the appellant on April 6, 2026. Accordingly, the motion for extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary. The request for the appeal to be heard on the original record without reproducing any part is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant will need to attach only the district court order(s) under review to his opening brief. See Circuit Rule 30(a). The district court no longer transmits the record on appeal to this court. Because the record is electronic, it is available for this court's use without the need for transmission of a physical record. The court will have electronic access to the complete record on appeal when it considers the merits of this appeal. CDH [16] [7515977] [26-1274] (CG) [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:46 AM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Yates for recruitment of counsel. [15] [7515742] [26-1274] (CAG) [Entered: 04/06/2026 03:40 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Yates for case to be heard on original record. [14] [7515740] [26-1274] (CAG) [Entered: 04/06/2026 03:39 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Yates to extend time to file appellant's brief. [13] [7515735] [26-1274] (CAG) [Entered: 04/06/2026 03:38 PM]
April 2, 2026 Filing 12 Attorney Samuel T. Ward-Packard for Daniel L. LaVoie, Roslyn Huneke and Karl Hoffman in 26-1274 terminated and added Attorney(s) Frances Reynolds Colbert for party(s) Appellee Daniel L. LaVoie Appellee Karl Hoffman Appellee Roslyn Huneke, in case 26-1274 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Frances Reynolds Colbert for Appellees Karl Hoffman, Roslyn Huneke and Daniel L. LaVoie. [12] [7515063] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-1274]--[Edited 04/03/2026 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Reynolds Colbert, Frances) [Entered: 04/02/2026 02:17 PM]
March 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The district court GRANTED appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and this court has now received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/23/2026 for Michael C. Yates. Appellees' brief due on or before 05/26/2026 for Karl Hoffman, Doctor, Roslyn Huneke and Daniel L. LaVoie. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/16/2026 for Appellant Michael C. Yates. JXK [7512864] [26-1274] (HTP) [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:24 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 10 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $27.55 from Appellant Michael C. Yates on 03/23/2026. [10] [7512651] [26-1274] (CAH) [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:58 PM]
March 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Letter requesting clarification. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). On February 25, 2026, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and assessed a $27.55 initial partial filing fee. Because the appellant has not yet paid the initial partial filing fee, this court has not set a briefing schedule. Accordingly, the appellant shall pay the initial partial filing fee in the district court by April 17, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Any other relief requested in the appellants letter is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated February 11, 2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9551 67. [9] [7511720] CDH [26-1274] (CG) [Entered: 03/18/2026 10:27 AM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 8 Filed letter from Appellant Michael C. Yates regarding Letter requesting clarification. [8] [7511630] [26-1274] (EF) [Entered: 03/17/2026 03:48 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 7 Filed letter from Appellant Michael C. Yates regarding docketing statement. [7] [7510945] [26-1274] (EF) [Entered: 03/13/2026 03:05 PM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Samuel T. Ward-Packard for Appellees Karl Hoffman, Roslyn Huneke and Daniel L. LaVoie. [6] [7509721] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-1274] [Edited 03/09/2026 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Ward-Packard, Samuel) [Entered: 03/09/2026 03:40 PM]
March 2, 2026 Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael C. Yates. [5] [7508319] [26-1274] (CAH) [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:57 PM]
February 26, 2026 Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael C. Yates. [4] [7507703] [26-1274] (PS) [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:42 PM]
February 25, 2026 Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Michael C. Yates leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 02/25/2026. District Court has assessed a $27.55 initial partial filing fee. [3] [7507328] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 03/27/2026. [26-1274] (CAG) [Entered: 02/25/2026 01:24 PM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael C. Yates. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7506377] [26-1274] (EF) [Entered: 02/20/2026 03:22 PM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael C. Yates by 02/17/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 02/25/2026. [1] [7504186] [26-1274] (HTP) [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Yates v. Karl Hoffman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C. YATES
Represented By: Michael C. Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor
Represented By: Frances Reynolds Colbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSLYN HUNEKE
Represented By: Frances Reynolds Colbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL L. LAVOIE
Represented By: Frances Reynolds Colbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?