Nirin Walls v. Lana Nalewajka, et al
| NIRIN A. WALLS |
| LANA NALEWAJKA, VIPIN SHAH and JODI A. PELEGRIN |
| 26-1313 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and PLRA memorandum. [5] [7509747] [26-1313] (EF) [Entered: 03/09/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Nirin A. Walls. [4] [7509512] [26-1313] (AP) [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Nirin A. Walls leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 03/03/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/02/2026.[3] [7508506] [26-1313] (CAG) [Entered: 03/03/2026 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [2] [7507906] [26-1313] (CAG) [Entered: 02/27/2026 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Nirin A. Walls by 02/24/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/19/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 03/03/2026. [1] [7505477] [26-1313] (HTP) [Entered: 02/18/2026 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
