Valerie Flores v. Amy Flemming, et al
Plaintiff: VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant: AMY W. FLEMMING, CINDY ZIRNGIBLE, LORI BALDWIN, JANET MONTGOMERY and STACY ZIBELL
Case Number: 26-1437
Filed: March 4, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [16] [7521923] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:45 AM]
April 30, 2026 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/30/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7521928-2] [7521928] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:50 AM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 15 Appearance form filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores. [15] [7520025] [26-1437] (DAB) [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:03 PM]
April 1, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Appellant Valerie L. Flores is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Valerie L. Flores by 04/15/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9588 09. [14] [7514629] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 04/01/2026 09:10 AM]
March 26, 2026 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [13] [7513486] [26-1437] (CAH) [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:15 PM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 12 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Valerie L. Flores leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 03/25/2026. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/24/2026 for Appellant Valerie L. Flores [7513097] [12] [7513097] [26-1437] (AP) [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:54 AM]
March 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Motion. The motion is DENIED. [ # 7 ] CLH [11] [7510116] [26-1437] (HTP) [Entered: 03/11/2026 10:08 AM]
March 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: 1. Motion. 2. Motion. 3. Civil appeal transcript information for pro se appellants. A review of the docket shows that the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending in the district court. This court will not set a briefing schedule until the appellants fee status has been resolved. Accordingly, the court will take no action on the appellants request to set a briefing schedule. To the extent that the appellant seeks oral argument, the request will be considered by the court in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34. The appellant shall file her overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by March 24, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. To the extent that the appellant seeks copies of record items, that request should be made in the district court. The district court no longer transmits the record on appeal to this court. Because the record is electronic, it is available for this courts use without the need for transmission of a physical record. The court will have electronic access to the complete record on appeal when it considers the merits of this appeal. The appellant is reminded that she should order any necessary transcripts from the court reporter using the form prescribed by this court. Cir. R. 10(c). The clerk shall send the appellant a transcript information sheet form. Appellant shall file her transcript information sheet, if one is necessary, by March 24, 2026. Based on a review of the district courts docket, however, it appears no hearings were held. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1607 0849 02. CDH [10] [7510010] [26-1437] (HTP) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:52 PM]
March 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. CDH [6] [7509835] [26-1437] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:20 AM]
March 10, 2026 Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Valerie L. Flores. [5] [7509828] [26-1437] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:10 AM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores for oral argument. [9] [7509887] [26-1437] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:51 AM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores to set briefing. [8] [7509886] [26-1437] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:50 AM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores for injunction. [7] [7509885] [26-1437] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:49 AM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7509757] [26-1437] (CAG) [Entered: 03/09/2026 04:11 PM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: The Flemmings, Margaret Haefer, John Meade, Jim Diece, 2022/2023 Tenants at Whispering Pines Complex and Whispering Pines Association. [3] [7509161] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:24 PM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7509157] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:21 PM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/18/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Valerie L. Flores by 03/03/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/18/2026 for Appellant Valerie L. Flores. [1] [7509151] [26-1437] (AD) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Valerie Flores v. Amy Flemming, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VALERIE L. FLORES
Represented By: Valerie L. Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMY W. FLEMMING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CINDY ZIRNGIBLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LORI BALDWIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANET MONTGOMERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STACY ZIBELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?