Kenneth Washington v. Keith Vinardi
| KENNETH WASHINGTON |
| KEITH VINARDI, Warden |
| 26-1466 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [7] [7520514] [26-1466] (AD) [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:24 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/24/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7520517-2] [7520517] [26-1466] (AD) [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:31 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellants docketing statement and any transcript information sheet are due by April 16, 2026. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk will send the appellant a transcript information sheet form and this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. In his docketing statement, the appellant should attempt to provide the information listed in the Pro Se Instructions, particularly the date of the district court judgment or order being challenged in this appeal. [ # 5 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1607 0849 88. CDH [6] [7515100] [26-1466] (HTP) [Entered: 04/02/2026 02:55 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Kenneth Washington to extend time to file. Forwarded from the District Court. [5] [7515021] [26-1466] (AP) [Entered: 04/02/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. [4] [7512707] [26-1466]--[Edited 03/24/2026 by AD] (AD) [Entered: 03/24/2026 08:33 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Kenneth Washington is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Kenneth Washington by 04/07/2026. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9587 31. [3] [7512705] [26-1466] (AD) [Entered: 03/24/2026 08:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: In light of Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000), this case may proceed without a certificate of appealability. JR [2] [7509860] [26-1466] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:08 AM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Kenneth Washington by 03/16/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/20/2026 for Kenneth Washington. Transcript information sheet due by 03/23/2026. [1] [7509855] [26-1466] (CG) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Washington v. Keith Vinardi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KENNETH WASHINGTON | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Washington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: KEITH VINARDI, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Joseph Dayton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
