Zoe Marsh-Leigh v. City of Chicago, et al
| ZOE MARSH-LEIGH |
| CITY OF CHICAGO, BRANDON JOHNSON, STEVE BERLIN, MAYA STEINBACK and ROSSANA RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ |
| 26-1495 |
| March 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [11] [7516406] [26-1495] (SK) [Entered: 04/08/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. Paper copies due on 04/14/2026. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [10] [7515921] [26-1495] (SK) [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 9 Submitted appellant brief by Danielle Le Roy for Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [9] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7515844] [26-1495] (Le Roy, Danielle) [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 8 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted via Zoom, Monday, March 30, 2026 at 1:30p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [8] [7511838] [26-1495]--[Edited 03/18/2026 by HTP removed as erroneously issued.] (HTP) [Entered: 03/18/2026 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Danielle Le Roy for Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [7] [7511043] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1495] (Le Roy, Danielle) [Entered: 03/14/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7511042] [26-1495] (Le Roy, Danielle) [Entered: 03/14/2026 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 Notice to appellant VACATING the 03/12/2026, Circuit Rule 3(b) Notice. The plaintiff-appellant was initially granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court on 08/26/2024. The appellant's opening brief and required short appendix is due on or before 04/22/2026 for Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [5] [7511012] [26-1495] (JR) [Entered: 03/13/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [4] [7510782] [26-1495] (HTP) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7510778] [26-1495] (HTP) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Alvin Starks. [2] [7510777] [26-1495] (HTP) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh by 03/19/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 03/26/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/26/2026 for Appellant Zoe Marsh-Leigh. [1] [7510772] [26-1495] (HTP) [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
