Bobby Ford v. Martha Pacold
| BOBBY FORD |
| MARTHA M. PACOLD |
| JEREMY WITT, RUFUS B. CLARK and CARL NEWEY |
| 26-1499 |
| March 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: 1. Affidavit accompanying motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 3/30/2026. 2. Motion for court-appointed counsel, filed on 3/30/2026. In light of the courts final order dated March 17, 2026, the petitioners motions will be filed without further court action. CDH [5] [7514420] [26-1499} (FP) [Entered: 03/31/2026 12:12 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Petitioner Bobby Ford for appointment of counsel. [4] [7514231] [26-1499] (EF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Petitioner Bobby Ford to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7514228] [26-1499] (EF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:43 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER re: Petition for writ of mandamus. In light of the district courts March 13, 2026 order denying the petitioners motion to reinstate his case, the petition is DENIED as unnecessary. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Amy J. St. Eve, Circuit Judge and John Z. Lee, Circuit Judge. [2] [7511399] [26-1499] (CG) [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:34 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/17/2026 Final Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7511410-2] [7511410] [26-1499] (CG) [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/26/2026 for Petitioner Bobby Ford. [1] [7510868] [26-1499] (CG) [Entered: 03/13/2026 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
