Scott Peters v. Clint Tanner, et al
Plaintiff: SCOTT PETERS
Defendant: CLINT TANNER, MEGAN VANPELT, VIRGINIA CHENG, TRAVIS JAMES and MORGAN WALKER
Case Number: 26-1517
Filed: March 16, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 9 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 05/29/2026 for Scott Peters. Appellees' brief due on or before 06/29/2026 for Virginia Cheng, Travis James, Clint Tanner, Megan VanPelt and Morgan Walker. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/20/2026 for Appellant Scott Peters. CDH [10] [7523319] [26-1517] (PS) [Entered: 05/05/2026 02:48 PM]
May 4, 2026 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott Peters to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7522915] [26-1517] (NHV) [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:34 PM]
May 4, 2026 Filing 8 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Scott Peters. [8] [7522913] [26-1517] (NHV) [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:32 PM]
April 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER issued GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to File Transcript Information Sheet and Affidavit of compliance with Court Ordered Filing Fee to the extent that any transcript information sheet is due by April 30, 2026. The clerk will send the appellant a transcript information sheet form and a copy of the courts public docket. [ # 6 ] CDH [7] [7516045] [26-1517] (AD) [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:50 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott Peters to extend time to file transcript information sheet and affidavit of compliance with court ordered filing fee. [6] [7515803] [26-1517] (CAH) [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:06 PM]
March 30, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/29/2026 for Scott Peters. Appellees' brief due on or before 05/29/2026 for Virginia Cheng, Travis James, Clint Tanner, Megan VanPelt and Morgan Walker. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/22/2026 for Appellant Scott Peters. JXK [7514157] [26-1517] (AD) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:14 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 4 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $32.39 from Appellant Scott Peters on 03/30/2026. [4] [7513991] [26-1517] (CAG) [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:39 AM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Scott Peters leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 03/18/2026. District Court has assessed a $32.39 initial partial filing fee. [3] [7511987] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 04/20/2026. Plaintiff's request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED as moot. [26-1517] (CAH) [Entered: 03/19/2026 10:02 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Shelby Huey. [2] [7511406] [26-1517] (HTP) [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:44 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/30/2026. [1] [7511401] [26-1517] (HTP) [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Scott Peters v. Clint Tanner, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SCOTT PETERS
Represented By: Scott Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLINT TANNER
Represented By: Timothy Charles Sansone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEGAN VANPELT
Represented By: Timothy Charles Sansone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRGINIA CHENG
Represented By: Timothy Charles Sansone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRAVIS JAMES
Represented By: Timothy Charles Sansone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORGAN WALKER
Represented By: Timothy Charles Sansone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?