Executive Committee of the United States District v. Aaron Stewart
| EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS |
| AARON STEWART |
| 26-1535 |
| March 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Motion to withdraw appeal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 4 ][5][7519428] [26-1535] (HTP) [Entered: 04/20/2026 04:12 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Stewart to withdraw appeal. [4] [7519327] [26-1535] (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:18 PM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/20/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7519434-2] [7519434] [26-1535] (HTP) [Entered: 04/20/2026 04:21 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Re: Motion to Strike Notice of Appeal. On March 17, 2026, this court received a document from appellant Aaron Stewart that captioned appeal no. 24-1171, which stems from district court case no. 08 C 2232. The mandate in appeal no. 24-1171 issued on November 10, 2025, and the appeal remains closed. The document also captioned district court case nos. 13 C 1374 or 13 C 112. Because appeal no. 24-1171 is closed and the appellants document appeared to be challenging the district courts order dated January 29, 2026, in district court case no. 13 C 1374, the document was forwarded to the district court to be treated as a notice of appeal. Appellant Aaron Stewart now asks this court to strike appeal no. 26-1535. If the appellant does not wish to proceed with this appeal, he may file a motion to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any such motion is due by April 30, 2026. If the appellant does wish to proceed with this appeal he must file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement, and either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by April 30, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. To the extent that appellant is seeking any relief in appeal no. 24-1171, the court will take no action on the request because the case is closed. The clerk will send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket for appeal no. 24-1171. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9587 93. CDH [3] [7514514] [26-1535] (AD) [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:51 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Stewart to strike notice of appeal. [2] [7513772] [26-1535] (DAB) [Entered: 03/27/2026 04:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Executive Committee of the United States District v. Aaron Stewart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AARON STEWART | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
