Zsoch Dunn v. Executive Committee of the United States District
| ZSOCH DUNN |
| EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS |
| 26-1559 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: 1. Pro se memorandum. filed on 5/15/2026. 2. Motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 6/12/2026. 3. Motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on 8/18/2026. The motions for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Appellant has not identified a potentially meritorious argument that the executive committee erred in denying leave to file his complaints. Appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). [ # 8 ] [ # 7 ] [ # 4 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1883 7747 57. [9] [7553307] JXK [26-1559] (FP) [Entered: 09/04/2026 02:23 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Zsoch Dunn to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from the District Court). [8] [7548354] [26-1559] (CAG) [Entered: 08/18/2026 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Zsoch Dunn to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7532566] [26-1559] (NHV) [Entered: 06/12/2026 01:26 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. Motion for petition for review of executive committee order, filed on 5/15/2026. 2. Motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, filed on 5/15/2026. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellants fee status has been determined. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. The clerk will treat the appellants petition for review of executive committee order as his PLRA memorandum in support of his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and will update the docket accordingly. To the extent that the appellant seeks to proceed in forma pauperis with this court, his paperwork is incomplete because it does not include the required asset affidavit. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required asset affidavit with the clerk of this court by June 18, 2026. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. Further, the request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated March 23, 2026. [ # 3 ] [ # 4 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3395 8355. [6] [7526862] CDH [26-1559] (FP) [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:26 PM]
|
| Filing 5 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Zsoch Dunn. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [5] [7526207] [26-1559] (CAG) [Entered: 05/18/2026 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Zsoch Dunn titled order to show cause for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. [4] [7526111] [26-1559] (AP) [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se PLRA memorandum motion filed by Appellant Zsoch. Dunn for petition for review of executive committee order. [3] [7526110] [26-1559]--[Edited 05/21/2026 by FP to reflect updated event and correct document type.] (AP) [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Zsoch Dunn leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/30/2026. [2] [7526109] [26-1559] (AP) [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's federal civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Zsoch Dunn by 03/27/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/22/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 04/06/2026. [1] [7512756] [26-1559] (HTP) [Entered: 03/24/2026 09:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Zsoch Dunn v. Executive Committee of the United States District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ZSOCH DUNN | |
| Represented By: | Zsoch Dunn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
