USA v. Pablo Lopez-Rios
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| PABLO LOPEZ-RIOS, also known as Caballo |
| 26-1622 |
| March 31, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion to dismiss duplicate appeals. [ # 5 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [6][7518993] [26-1622] (PS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:15 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/17/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7518996-2] [7518996] [26-1622] (PS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios in 26-1515, 26-1128, 26-1516, 26-1622 & 26-1623 to dismiss duplicate appeals. [5] [7518725] [26-1622, 26-1623]--[Edited 04/17/2026 by PS - text updated.] (DAB) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7515924] [26-1622] (AD) [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:02 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record suggests that this appeal duplicates an appeal filed on March 16, 2026, and docketed in this court as Appeal No. 26-1515. A party needs only one appeal from any given judgment or order, and the other should be dismissed. Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC, 140 F.4th 839, 845 (7th Cir. 2025); Harris v. Bellin Meml Hosp., 13 F.3d 1082, 1083 (7th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the appellant shall file, on or before April 15, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. JXK [7514824][3] [3] [7514824] [26-1622] (FP) [Entered: 04/01/2026 03:11 PM]
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Defendant filed the appeal pro se in this criminal action. Counsel is reminded of the obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by court upon a motion to withdraw for good cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel comply with the provisions of FRAP 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Attorney's response due for Gregory T. Mitchell, Attorney by 04/14/2026. JXK [2] [7514691] [26-1622] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:37 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios by 04/03/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/11/2026 for Pablo Lopez-Rios. Transcript information sheet due by 04/14/2026. Motion to Withdraw or to Appoint Counsel pursuant to Circuit Rule 46.1 due for Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios by 04/14/2026. [1] [7514657] [26-1622] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Pablo Lopez-Rios | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Maureen E. Merin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PABLO LOPEZ-RIOS, also known as Caballo | |
| Represented By: | Pablo Lopez-Rios |
| Represented By: | Gregory T. Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.