USA v. Pablo Lopez-Rios
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| PABLO LOPEZ-RIOS |
| 26-1623 |
| March 31, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion to dismiss duplicate appeals. [ # 5 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [6][7519003] [26-1623] (PS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:33 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/17/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7519005-2] [7519005] [26-1623] (PS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios in 26-1515, 26-1128, 26-1516, 26-1622 & 26-1623 to dismiss duplicate appeals. [5] [7518725] [26-1622, 26-1623]--[Edited 04/17/2026 by PS - text updated.] (DAB) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:12 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios by 04/29/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9589 84. [4] [7517972] [26-1623] (AD) [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record suggests that this pro se appeal duplicates an appeal filed by counsel for appellant on January 22, 2026, and docketed in this court as Appeal No. 26-1128. A party needs only one appeal from any given judgment or order, and the other should be dismissed. Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLC, 140 F.4th 839, 845 (7th Cir. 2025); Harris v. Bellin Meml Hosp., 13 F.3d 1082, 1083 (7th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, appellant shall file, on or before April 15, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. JXK [7514827] [3] [3] [7514827] [26-1623] (FP) [Entered: 04/01/2026 03:17 PM]
|
| Filing 2 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. Briefing remains suspended pending resolution of the motion to withdraw. JXK [2] [7514813] [26-1128, 26-1623]--[Edited 04/01/2026 by FP to reflect that this order was docketed in error.] (FP) [Entered: 04/01/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Pablo Lopez-Rios by 04/03/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/11/2026 for Pablo Lopez-Rios. Transcript information sheet due by 04/14/2026. [1] [7514685] [26-1623] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Pablo Lopez-Rios | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Maureen E. Merin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PABLO LOPEZ-RIOS | |
| Represented By: | Pablo Lopez-Rios |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
