Jordan Talley-Smith v. Kathleen Sullivan, et al
Plaintiff: JORDAN TALLEY-SMITH
Defendant: KATHLEEN A. SULLIVAN, E. HUERTA, Officer, Badge #HA625, sued in his individual capacity, E. IDAM, Lieutenant, Badge #HA417, sued in his individual capacity, BERNARD A. CARTER, Prosecutor for administrative misconduct only, sued in his individual capacity, also known as Bernard Carter and INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES, sued in its official capacity
Case Number: 26-1631
Filed: April 1, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2026 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7519417] [26-1631] (DAB) [Entered: 04/20/2026 04:01 PM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7519414] [26-1631] (DAB) [Entered: 04/20/2026 03:59 PM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 6 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith. [6] [7518726] [26-1631] (CAG) [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:12 PM]
April 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith by 04/29/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9590 28. [5] [7518014] [26-1631] (AD) [Entered: 04/15/2026 09:56 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/06/2026. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/07/2026 for Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith. [7516054] [4] [7516054] [26-1631] (JR) [Entered: 04/07/2026 02:12 PM]
April 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before April 16, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to review of the March 18, 2026, order denying appellants second motion for relief from the judgment. Because a preliminary review suggests that any appeal of that March 18, 2026, order may be frivolous, the memorandum must also explain why that order should not be summarily affirmed. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7514966] JXK [3] [7514966] [26-1631] (AP) [Entered: 04/02/2026 10:29 AM]
April 1, 2026 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Doe 1, unknown Hammond PD Captain, sued in his individual capacity; Does 2-X, sued in their individual capacities. [2] [7514722] [26-1631] (FP) [Entered: 04/01/2026 11:57 AM]
April 1, 2026 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 04/15/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jordan Talley-Smith by 04/06/2026. [1] [7514711] [26-1631] (FP) [Entered: 04/01/2026 11:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jordan Talley-Smith v. Kathleen Sullivan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JORDAN TALLEY-SMITH
Represented By: Jordan Talley-Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN A. SULLIVAN
Represented By: Adrienne Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. HUERTA, Officer, Badge #HA625, sued in his individual capacity
Represented By: Carly A. Brandenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. IDAM, Lieutenant, Badge #HA417, sued in his individual capacity
Represented By: Carly A. Brandenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERNARD A. CARTER, Prosecutor for administrative misconduct only, sued in his individual capacity, also known as Bernard Carter
Represented By: Adrienne Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES, sued in its official capacity
Represented By: Adrienne Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?