Hunter Alexander v. John Does, et al
| HUNTER ALEXANDER |
| JOHN DOES and CAR MAKERS, GM, Ford, Toyota, Chevy, etc. |
| 26-1707 |
| April 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks appointment of counsel, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated April 9, 2026. [ # 3 ] [4] [7523157] CDH [26-1707] (AP) [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:58 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Hunter Alexander for appointment of counsel. [3] [7522933] [26-1707] (CAG) [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7516769] [26-1707] (CG) [Entered: 04/09/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/23/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/11/2026. [1] [7516766] [26-1707] (CG) [Entered: 04/09/2026 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.