Alan Braid v. Susman Godfrey, LLP, et al
Plaintiff: ALAN BRAID
Defendant: WOLFGANG P. HIRCZY DE MINO
Appellee: SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
Case Number: 26-1797
Filed: April 16, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2026 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino for notice to the Attorney General of Texas and invitation to the Texas Solicitor General to articulate the views of the State. [8] [7530008] [26-1797] (CAH) [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:21 PM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino to shift appellate fees. [7] [7526490] [26-1797] (DAB) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:51 PM]
May 11, 2026 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino to remand for compliance with Circuit Rule 50, which requires District Court's to hand down a reasoned opinion and request to determine the legal and factual status of the interpleader funds. [6] [7524677] [26-1797] (CAH) [Entered: 05/11/2026 04:02 PM]
May 8, 2026 Filing 5 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the appellate court or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/22/2026 for Appellant Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino. [5] [7524146] [26-1797] (JR) [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:51 AM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 4 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellees Alan Braid and Susman Godfrey, LLP in 26-1330, 26-1797 to Appellant's Motion to Transfer Appeal to the Fifth Circuit. [4] [7523596] [26-1330, 26-1797] (Hess, Richard) [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:40 PM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Richard W. Hess for Appellees Alan Braid and Susman Godfrey, LLP in 26-1330, 26-1797. [3] [7523557] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1330, 26-1797] (Hess, Richard) [Entered: 05/06/2026 12:19 PM]
April 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record suggests this appeal may be untimely. Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and 28 U.S.C. 2107(a) require that a notice of appeal in a civil case be filed in the district court within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or order appealed. This deadline applies to amended notices of appeal as it does to any other notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii) (requiring notice within the time prescribed by this Rule); Nocula v. UGS Corp., 520 F.3d 719, 724 (7th Cir. 2008). In this case, appellant seeks to appeal the district courts February 13, 2026, amended order of disbursement. The notice of appeal was filed on April 16, 2026, one month late with respect to that order. The district court has not granted an extension of the appeal period, see 28 U.S.C. 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and this court is not empowered to do so, see Fed. R. App. P. 26(b). The only order entered within the 30 days prior to entry of judgment was the district courts April 13, 2026, order denying appellants request to provide further explanation and for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Rule 24(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure directs that an appellant should refile a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within the appeal from the judgment, here appeal No. 26-1330. Likewise, Circuit Rule 50 allows a party, when appropriate, to request a remand within an appeal for the district court to provide any necessary explanation. See, e.g., United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 591 (7th Cir. 2009). It is not necessary to file a separate appeal. Accordingly, appellant shall file, on or before May 4, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. [2] [7519284] JXK [2] [7519284] [26-1797] (AD) [Entered: 04/20/2026 12:49 PM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. IFP on Appeal denied on 04/13/2026. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/30/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/30/2026 for Appellant Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino. [1] [7518882] [26-1797] (CG) [Entered: 04/17/2026 11:08 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alan Braid v. Susman Godfrey, LLP, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALAN BRAID
Represented By: Richard W. Hess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WOLFGANG P. HIRCZY DE MINO
Represented By: Wolfgang P. Hirczy De Mino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
Represented By: Richard W. Hess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?