Haris Mujezinovic, et al v. Trustees of Indiana University, et al
| HARIS MUJEZINOVIC, CHARLIE MILLER, JOHN FLOWERS and LARRY RICHARDSON, JR. |
| TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY and TIM GARL |
| 26-1799 |
| April 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires the lead attorney and any attorney who intends to present oral argument be admitted to practice in this court. The lead attorney for each party represented by counsel must apply for admission to practice in this court by the later of: (a) 30 days from the docketing of the matter in this court; or (b) 15 days from being retained or appointed as counsel. An attorney who intends to present oral argument must apply for admission to practice in this court before the filing of the appellee's brief. Our records indicate Attorney Mr. Andrew D. Dettmer for Appellee Tim Garl has not been admitted to practice in this court as of this date. The "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit" form can be found at: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/applctn.pdf. The filing of the completed application must be accomplished via the CM/ECF filing system. [7] [7520187] [26-1799] (LJ) [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:03 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 06/22/2026 for John Flowers, Charlie Miller, Haris Mujezinovic and Larry Richardson Jr. Appellees' briefs due on or before 07/22/2026 for Tim Garl and Trustees of Indiana University. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/12/2026 for Appellants John Flowers, Charlie Miller, Haris Mujezinovic and Larry Richardson Jr. RJS [7519865] [26-1799] (AD) [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:55 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Friday, May 22, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS [5] [7519862] [26-1799] (AD) [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants John Flowers, Charlie Miller, Haris Mujezinovic and Larry Richardson, Jr. [4] [7519550] [26-1799] (Gutwein, Matthew) [Entered: 04/21/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew R. Gutwein, Kathleen A. DeLaney, Annavieve C. Conklin, Alexander J. Pantos for Appellants John Flowers, Charlie Miller, Haris Mujezinovic and Larry Richardson, Jr. [3] [7519545] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-1799] [3] [7519545] [26-1799]--[Edited 04/21/2026 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Gutwein, Matthew) [Entered: 04/21/2026 10:25 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7518931] JXK [2] [7518931] [26-1799] (HTP) [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:13 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/01/2026. Appellants' brief due on or before 05/27/2026 for John Flowers, Charlie Miller, Haris Mujezinovic and Larry Richardson Jr. [1] [7518925] [26-1799] (HTP) [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
