Theresa Barbero v. David Friess, et al
| THERESA M. BARBERO |
| DAVID H. FRIESS, ANNE M. RANDOLPH, BRYCE A. HILL, DENNIS E. BUCK, JEREMY R. WALKER and ROBIN K. BERT |
| 26-1909 |
| April 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [17] [7564493] [26-1909] (SK) [Entered: 10/21/2026 08:44 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/29/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7564502-2] [7564502] [26-1909] (SK) [Entered: 10/21/2026 08:54 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER issued DENYING Appellant's Motion to Redact and Seal Financial Information in the Appellate Record. Financial information related to appellants request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is not available to the public. Any information on the district courts docket is managed by that court. [ # 15 ] LMF [16] [7559676] [26-1909] (AD) [Entered: 09/30/2026 04:03 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Miss Theresa M. Barbero Redact and Seal private financial figures in district court's records documents 14 and 15. [15] [7559392] [26-1909] (Barbero, Theresa) [Entered: 09/29/2026 09:14 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: 1. Appellants motion under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 2. Exhibits. [ # 12 ] [ # 13 ] This court has carefully reviewed the final order of the district court, the record on appeal, and appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues which could be raised are insubstantial and that further briefing would not be helpful to the courts consideration of the issues. See Taylor v. City of New Albany , 979 F.2d 87 (7th Cir. 1992); Mather v. Village of Mundelein , 869 F.2d 356, 357 (7th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (court can decide case on motions papers and record where briefing would not assist the court and no member of the panel desires briefing or argument). The district court correctly held that plaintiffs claims are foreclosed by judicial immunity or fail to allege state action. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and the final order of the district court is summarily AFFIRMED. Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge; John Z. Lee, Circuit Judge and Nancy L. Maldonado, Circuit Judge. [14] [7559058] [26-1909] (PS) [Entered: 09/29/2026 09:48 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Exhibits to motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Miss Theresa M. Barbero. [13] [7544652] [26-1909] (CAG) [Entered: 08/03/2026 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Miss Theresa M. Barbero to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [12] [7544577] [26-1909] (Barbero, Theresa) [Entered: 08/01/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Miss Theresa M. Barbero leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/31/2026. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/31/2026 for Appellant Theresa M. Barbero. [7544391] [11] [7544391] [26-1909] (CG) [Entered: 07/31/2026 11:05 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Plaintiffappellants motion for status on pending matters. A review of the district courts docket shows that on April 27, 2026, the appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. That motion remains pending in the district court for consideration in the first instance. CDH [10] [7543343] [26-1909] (HTP) [Entered: 07/28/2026 10:19 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed status report by Appellant Miss Theresa M. Barbero. [9] [7543050] [26-1909] (Barbero, Theresa) [Entered: 07/27/2026 02:43 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Appellant's motion for leave to file electronically using CM/ECF. [ # 6 ] the motion to become an electronic filer is GRANTED. Appellant Theresa Barbero is granted permission to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing documents in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the appellants status as an electronic filer upon the termination of this appeal, the termination of her pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. CLH [8] [7523474] [26-1909] (CG) [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:58 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Theresa M. Barbero to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7522967] [26-1909] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Theresa M. Barbero to become an electronic filer. [6] [7522966] [26-1909] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Theresa M. Barbero. [5] [7522961] [26-1909] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Theresa M. Barbero. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7522959] [26-1909] (CAH) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney A.J. Bronsky for Appellee David H. Friess. [3] [7522934] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-1909] (Bronsky, Albert) [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees Robin K. Bert, Dennis E. Buck, Bryce A. Hill, Anne M. Randolph and Jeremy R. Walker, per District Court docket. [2] [7521278] [26-1909] (CG) [Entered: 04/28/2026 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Theresa M. Barbero by 05/04/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 05/12/2026. [1] [7521271] [26-1909] (CG) [Entered: 04/28/2026 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
