USA v. Labar Spann
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| LABAR SPANN |
| 26-2040 |
| May 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for voluntary dismissal. [ # 6 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [7][7527229] [26-2040] (PS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 04:33 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 05/20/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7527234-2] [7527234] [26-2040] (PS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Labar Spann to dismiss case. [6] [7526752] [26-2040] (Hunter, Steven) [Entered: 05/19/2026 02:49 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before May 27, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7525236][5] [5] [7525236] [26-2040] (PS) [Entered: 05/13/2026 01:02 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Motion filed by attorney Steven R. Hunter to withdraw as counsel for Appellant Labar Spann in 26-2035, 26-1898, 26-1899, 26-2040. [4] [7525066] [26-2035, 26-1898, 26-1899, 26-2040]--[Edited 05/13/2026 by HTP to reflect attorney motion.] (Hunter, Steven) [Entered: 05/12/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 Motion filed by Attorney Steven R. Hunter to withdraw as counsel for Appellant Labar Spann in 26-2040, 26-1898, 26-1899, 26-2035. [3] [7525062] [26-2040, 26-1898, 26-1899, 26-2035]--[Edited 05/13/2026 by CG to reflect attorney filer.] (Hunter, Steven) [Entered: 05/12/2026 05:24 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Defendant filed the appeal pro se in this criminal action. Counsel is reminded of the obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by court upon a motion to withdraw for good cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel comply with the provisions of FRAP 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Attorney's response due for Steven R. Hunter, Attorney by 05/26/2026 JXK [2] [7524909] [26-2040] (CG) [Entered: 05/12/2026 12:10 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Labar Spann by 05/15/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/22/2026 for Labar Spann. Transcript information sheet due by 05/26/2026. Motion to Withdraw or to Appoint Counsel pursuant to Circuit Rule 46.1 due for Appellant Labar Spann by 05/26/2026. [1] [7524901] [26-2040] (CG) [Entered: 05/12/2026 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Labar Spann | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Meghan Morrissey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LABAR SPANN | |
| Represented By: | Labar Spann |
| Represented By: | Steven R. Hunter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
