Marcos Gray v. Matthew Cobble, et al
| MARCOS GRAY |
| MATTHEW COBBLE, Supr., THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff and UNKNOWN MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIST |
| 26-2069 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $605 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $605 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court. [3][7539637] [26-2069] (CAG) [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:02 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/14/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7539640-2] [7539640] [26-2069] (CAG) [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7526856] [26-2069] (AD) [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/01/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Marcos Gray by 05/26/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/17/2026. [1] [7526790] [26-2069] (AD) [Entered: 05/19/2026 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
