Warren Richards v. Fashion Nova, LLC
| WARREN RICHARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| FASHION NOVA, LLC |
| 26-2082 |
| May 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Joint motion for stay of appeal, filed on 6/8/2026. The motion is GRANTED. Proceedings in this appeal are SUSPENDED pending the courts decision in Steidinger, et al. v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398. The parties shall file position statements within seven days of a decision in that case. [ # 5 ] ECL [7] [7532167] [26-2082, 26-2083] (FP) [Entered: 06/11/2026 10:58 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Warren Richards. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7531130] [26-2082] (Paronich, Anthony) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 Joint motion filed by Appellee Fashion Nova, LLC in 26-2082, Appellee Shein Distribution Corporation in 26-2083 for stay of Appeal. [5] [7531125] [26-2082, 26-2083] (Eisen, Mark) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mark Eisen for Appellee Fashion Nova, LLC. [4] [7531013] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-2082] [4] [7531013] [26-2082]--[Edited 06/08/2026 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Eisen, Mark) [Entered: 06/05/2026 05:24 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Warren Richards in 26-2082, 26-2083 is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Warren Richards by 06/17/2026. [3] [7530112] [26-2082, 26-2083] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2026 09:15 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's consolidated brief due on or before 06/29/2026 for Warren Richards. Appellees' consolidated brief due on or before 07/29/2026 for Fashion Nova, LLC and Shein Distribution Corporation. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/19/2026 for Appellant Warren Richards. JXK [2] [7527195] [26-2082, 26-2083] (PS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 03:49 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Warren Richards by 05/26/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 06/02/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/29/2026 for Warren Richards. [1] [7526972] [26-2082] (CG) [Entered: 05/20/2026 10:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Warren Richards v. Fashion Nova, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WARREN RICHARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Paronich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FASHION NOVA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mark S. Eisen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
