Keith Powell v. Village of Homewood, et al
| KEITH ERIC POWELL |
| VILLAGE OF HOMEWOOD, DENISE MCGRATH, ROBERT MISNER, CRAIG SLINE, ERIC BUJAK and KYLE HOEFLER |
| 26-2123 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER re: Appellant's motion to designate paid track no. 26-2123 as the sole unified vehicle governing all appellate merits and to dismiss co-member track no. 26-2028. Appellant Keith Powell filed two appeals, which this court has consolidated. No. 26-2028 is an appeal from the district courts summary judgment order and final judgment, and no. 26-2123 is from the district courts order denying relief from the judgment. Powell asks to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 26-2028 without prejudice and to proceed on appeal no. 26-2123. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) allows an appellant to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. However, once the appeal is dismissed, the appellant cannot reinstate it at a later date. If appeal no. 26-2028 is dismissed, Powells arguments on appeal will be limited to the order denying relief from the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Gleason v. Jansen, 888 F.3d 847, 851 (7th Cir. 2018). Because it is unclear that Powell wants to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 26-2028, the motion is DENIED. Should Powell decide that he does not want to proceed with appeal no. 26-2028, he may move to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If Powell does not file a compliant motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 26-2028, he must either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by August 17, 2026. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of appeal no. 26-2028. [ # 7 ] SCR [12] [7540494] [26-2028, 26-2123] (HTP) [Entered: 07/16/2026 02:54 PM]
|
| Filing 11 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Keith Eric Powell in 26-2028, 26-2123. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [11] [7537867] [26-2028, 26-2123] (SK) [Entered: 07/06/2026 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 10 Submitted appellant brief by Keith Powell for Appellant Keith Eric Powell in 26-2123, 26-2028. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7537773] [26-2123, 26-2028] (Powell, Keith) [Entered: 07/06/2026 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Keith Powell for Appellant Keith Eric Powell in 26-2123, 26-2028. [9] [7536881] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2123, 26-2028] (Powell, Keith) [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:56 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER re: Appellant's motion for leave to file documents electronically. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED. Appellant Keith Powell is granted leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this consolidated appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the pro se litigants filing user status upon the termination of the case, termination of the litigants pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. SCR [8] [7533495] [26-2028, 26-2123] (CG) [Entered: 06/17/2026 09:01 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Keith Eric Powell in 26-2028, 26-2123 to designate paid track number 26-2123 as the sole, unified vehicle governing all appellate merits and to dismiss co-member track number 26-2028. [7] [7532572] [26-2028, 26-2123] (CAG) [Entered: 06/12/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Keith Eric Powell in 26-2028, 26-2123 to become an electronic filer. [6] [7531281] [26-2028, 26-2123] (CAH) [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Lori A. Vanderlaan for Appellees Robert Misner, Craig Sline and Village of Homewood in 26-2028, 26-2123. [5] [7531088] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2028, 26-2123] (Vanderlaan, Lori) [Entered: 06/08/2026 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Keith Eric Powell. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 26-2028 [4] [7529591] [26-2123] (CAG) [Entered: 06/01/2026 01:32 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending a determination of appellants fee status in appeal No. 26-2028. See Ammons v. Gerlinger, 547 F.3d 724, 726 (7th Cir. 2008). JXK [3] [7528690] [26-2028, 26-2123] (CG) [Entered: 05/27/2026 03:23 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Keith Powell. [2] [7528614] [26-2028, 26-2123] (JR) [Entered: 05/27/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Keith Powell by 05/28/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 06/09/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 07/06/2026 for Keith Powell. [1] [7528531] [26-2123] (CG) [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.