Lonny Mayer v. Kevin Carr, et al
| LONNY A. MAYER |
| KEVIN A. CARR, DYLON RADTKE, JOHN KIND, DANIEL CUSHING, JAY VAN LANEN and JODENE PERTTU |
| 26-2214 |
| June 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Lonny A. Mayer leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 06/26/2026. District Court has assessed a $20.41 initial partial filing fee. [8] [7535961] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 07/27/2026. [26-2214] (CAG) [Entered: 06/26/2026 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lonny A. Mayer to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7534594] [26-2214] (DAB) [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Lonny A. Mayer. [6] [7534590] [26-2214] (DAB) [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:11 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER re: Notice of incompleteness, filed 6/16/2026. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time, the appellant shall file his overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement and any transcript information sheet by July 1, 2026. Further, the appellant shall either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by July 17, 2026. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk will send the appellant a transcript information sheet and asset affidavit form. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3395 8478. [5] [7533689] CDH [26-2214] (FP) [Entered: 06/17/2026 02:23 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed notice of incompleteness by Appellant Lonny A. Mayer. [4] [7533175] [26-2214] (CAH) [Entered: 06/16/2026 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Rebecca Ann Paulson for Jay Van Lanen, Dylon Radtke, Jodene Perttu, John Kind and Kevin A. Carr in 26-2214 terminated and added Attorney(s) Frances Reynolds Colbert for party(s) Appellee Daniel Cushing Appellee Dylon Radtke Appellee Jay Van Lanen Appellee Jodene Perttu Appellee Kevin A. Carr Appellee John Kind, in case 26-2214 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Frances Reynolds Colbert for Appellees Kevin A. Carr, Daniel Cushing, John Kind, Jodene Perttu, Dylon Radtke and Jay Van Lanen. Additional Parties: Anthony Matushak, Kelly Reignier, Scott Leurquin, Suzanne Stank, Keith Petri, Jamie Wertel, Hillary Berg, Rachel Matushak, and Sherrie Strabel. [3] [7532936] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-2214]--[Edited 06/16/2026 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Reynolds Colbert, Frances) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Jodene Perttu; Anthony Matushak; Kelly Reignier; Scott Leurquin; Suzanane Stank; Keith Petri; Jamie Wertel; Hillary Berg; Rachel Matushak; Sherrie Strabel; [2] [7531132] [26-2214] (FP) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/22/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lonny A. Mayer by 06/03/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 07/06/2026. [1] [7531107] [26-2214] (FP) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
