Pete Szmurlo v. John Tharp, Jr., et al
| PETE R. SZMURLO |
| JOHN J. THARP, JR., ALBERTA RONE and DANIELLE M. KAYS |
| 26-2216 |
| June 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before June 22, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to review of the May 4, 2026, and June 3, 2026, orders denying relief from the judgment and reconsideration of relief from the judgment. Because a preliminary review suggests that any appeal of the May 4, 2026, and June 3, 2026, orders may be frivolous, the memorandum must also explain why those orders should not be summarily affirmed. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7531213] [3] [7531213] [26-2216] (PS) [Entered: 06/08/2026 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7531129] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [26-2216] (AP) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Pete R. Szmurlo by 06/10/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 06/22/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/22/2026 for Appellant Pete R. Szmurlo. [1] [7531124] [26-2216] (AP) [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
