Carlos Massey v. United States District Court for the Northern Dis, et al
| CARLOS MASSEY |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, VIRGINIA M. KENDALL and EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS |
| 26-2299 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Petitioner Carlos Massey Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En banc is DENIED. [7] [7541777] [26-2299] (AD) [Entered: 07/22/2026 01:25 PM]
|
| Filing 6 15 copies Filed Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En banc by Petitioner Carlos Massey. DIST. [6] [7539797] [26-2299] (DAB) [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:30 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Re: 1) Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. 2) Preliminary Statement. In light of the courts final order dated June 23, 2026, the petitioners motion will be filed without further court action. CDH [5] [7537456] [26-2299] (AD) [Entered: 07/02/2026 03:51 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Exhibits filed by Petitioner Carlos Massey. [4] [7537338] [26-2299] (NHV) [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Petitioner Carlos Massey to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7537336] [26-2299] (NHV) [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:13 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER re: Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The petition is DENIED. Additionally, this petition does not fall under the Crime Victims Rights Act because the petitioner does not assert that he is the victim of a crime. See 18 U.S.C. 3771. [ # 1 ] [2] [7534721] [26-2299] (HTP) [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:13 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/23/2026 Mandamus Final Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7534728-2] [7534728] [26-2299] (HTP) [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/02/2026 for Petitioner Carlos Massey. [1] [7534212] [26-2299] (HTP) [Entered: 06/22/2026 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carlos Massey v. United States District Court for the Northern Dis, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CARLOS MASSEY | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Massey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: VIRGINIA M. KENDALL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
