Joshua Hoskins v. Ali Henson, et al
| JOSHUA HOSKINS |
| ALI HENSON, Former Correctional Officer, Dixon Correctional Center, ROGER JULIUS, Correctional Sergeant, Dixon Correctional Center, JACOB BILLINGS, Correctional Officer, Dixon Correctional Center, DALLAS THIELEN, Correctional Lieutenant, Dixon Correctional Center and JACOB LONG, Correctional Lieutenant, Dixon Correctional Center |
| 26-2326 |
| June 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. These appeals will proceed to a determination of appellants fee status. JXK [3] [7535527] [26-2326, 26-2327, 26-2328, 26-2329, 26-2330, 26-2331] (FP) [Entered: 06/25/2026 12:58 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Daniel Ditzler, Jefry Dalke, Peter Knudson, Renee Stevens, Amy Saul, Ann Ganger, Nathan Burgess, Scott Silva. [2] [7535209] [26-2326] (CG) [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Joshua Hoskins by 07/01/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 07/08/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/08/2026 for Appellant Joshua Hoskins. [1] [7535201] [26-2326] (CG) [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
