Michael Tabango v. Purdue University, et al
| MICHAEL WILLIAMSON TABANGO |
| PURDUE UNIVERSITY, NEERA SUNDARAM, GREGORY SHAVER, ALYSA ROLLOCK and CHRISTINE M. MARCUCCILLI |
| 26-2338 |
| June 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango. [16] [7544192] [26-2338] (CFK) [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 15 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Charity Seaborn for Appellees Christine M. Marcuccilli, Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Gregory Shaver and Neera Sundaram. [15] [7542147] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2338] (Seaborn, Charity) [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 14 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Christine M. Marcuccilli, Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Gregory Shaver and Neera Sundaram. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [14] [7542132] [26-2338] (Maley, John) [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:24 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER re: Motion for Extension of Time. The motion is GRANTED only to the extent that briefing shall proceed as follows: [ # 12 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 09/18/2026 for Michael Williamson Tabango. Appellees' brief due on or before 10/19/2026 for Christine M. Marcuccilli, Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Gregory Shaver and Neera Sundaram. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/09/2026 for Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango. CDH [13] [7541399] [26-2338]--[Edited 07/21/2026 by SCB] (SCB) [Entered: 07/21/2026 12:18 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango to extend time to file appellant's brief. [12] [7541131] [26-2338] (CAH) [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:41 PM] |
|
Filing 11
Order issued DENYING motion to become an electronic filer. [ # 10 ] ECL [11] [7539427] [26-2338] (FP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:40 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango to become an electronic filer. [10] [7538890] [26-2338] (NHV) [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7538888] [26-2338] (NHV) [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:04 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango by 07/23/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1811 003171. [8] [7538663] [26-2338] (AD) [Entered: 07/09/2026 09:14 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango. [7] [7538662] [26-2338] (AD) [Entered: 07/09/2026 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney John R. Maley for Appellees Christine M. Marcuccilli, Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Gregory Shaver and Neera Sundaram. [6] [7537050] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2338] [6] [7537050] [26-2338]--[Edited 07/01/2026 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Maley, John) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires the lead attorney and any attorney who intends to present oral argument be admitted to practice in this court. The lead attorney for each party represented by counsel must apply for admission to practice in this court by the later of: (a) 30 days from the docketing of the matter in this court; or (b) 15 days from being retained or appointed as counsel. An attorney who intends to present oral argument must apply for admission to practice in this court before the filing of the appellee's brief. Our records indicate Attorney Charity N. Seaborn for Appellees Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Neera Sundaram, Gregory Shaver and Christine M. Marcuccilli has not been admitted to practice in this court as of this date. The "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit" form can be found at: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/applctn.pdf. The filing of the completed application must be accomplished via the CM/ECF filing system. [5] [7536450] [26-2338] (LJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 10:08 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 07/29/2026 for Michael Williamson Tabango. Appellee's brief due on or before 08/28/2026 for Christine M. Marcuccilli, Purdue University, Alysa Rollock, Gregory Shaver and Neera Sundaram. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/18/2026 for Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango [4] [7536290] [26-2338] (CAG) [Entered: 06/29/2026 03:53 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [3] [7536288] [26-2338] (CAG) [Entered: 06/29/2026 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Christina Wright. [2] [7535467] [26-2338] (HTP) [Entered: 06/25/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango by 07/01/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 07/08/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/08/2026 for Appellant Michael Williamson Tabango. [1] [7535462] [26-2338] (HTP) [Entered: 06/25/2026 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
