Lisa Miller v. George Taylor, et al
| LISA MILLER |
| GEORGE TAYLOR, LILLIAN LYNN TAYLOR, WAYNE GREESON, PAT BADELL and CRIS STREIBECK |
| 26-2390 |
| July 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time to complete service and brief, filed on 7/30/2026. A review of the docket shows that the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending before this court. Because the appellants fee status is unresolved, the court has not set a briefing schedule. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file her opening brief, the motion is DENIED as unnecessary at this time. A review of the district courts docket shows that no appellees nor attorney for the appellees filed an appearance in the district court before the district court entered its final order and judgment. Because no appellees or counsel for the appellees were served by the district court or made an appearance in that court, there are no appellees involved in this appeal. [ # 9 ] CDH [10] [7544497] [26-2390] (FP) [Entered: 07/31/2026 03:06 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lisa Miller to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7544235] [26-2390] (CAG) [Entered: 07/30/2026 03:56 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion for leave to file electronically. [ # 4 ] Appellant Lisa Millers request to become an electronic filer is GRANTED. Miller is granted permission to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing documents in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate Milers status as an electronic filer upon the termination of this appeal, the termination of her pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. ASG [8] [7541358] [26-2390] (PS) [Entered: 07/21/2026 11:14 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lisa Miller to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7539857] [26-2390] (NHV) [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Lisa Miller. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7539852] [26-2390] (NHV) [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Lisa Miller. [5] [7539847] [26-2390] (NHV) [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lisa Miller to become an electronic filer. [4] [7539844] [26-2390] (NHV) [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7537144] [26-2390] (PS) [Entered: 07/01/2026 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Crisalida Gay, Tracy Brannon, Timothy Bruehl, Samantha Copley, Richard Greeson, and Circuit Judge Brian Hill. [2] [7537142] [26-2390] (PS) [Entered: 07/01/2026 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP on appeal denied on 06/30/2026. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lisa Miller by 07/07/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 07/15/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/15/2026 for Appellant Lisa Miller. [1] [7537141] [26-2390] (PS) [Entered: 07/01/2026 04:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
