Bataski Bailey v. Cenlar FSB
Plaintiff: BATASKI BAILEY
Defendant: CENLAR FSB, incorrectly named as CENLAR AGENCY, INC.
Case Number: 26-2423
Filed: July 7, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details) Candace Jackson-Akiwumi, Circuit Judge; Joshua P. Kolar, Circuit Judge and Nancy L. Maldonado, Circuit Judge. [8] [7553034] [26-2423] (PS) [Entered: 09/03/2026 04:09 PM]
July 31, 2026 Filing 7 Filed Response by Appellee Cenlar FSB to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. Submitted appellee brief by Nicholas S. Agnello for Appellee Cenlar FSB. [7] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7544551] [26-2423]--[Edited 08/03/2026 by DAB to correct filing type] Date updated: 08/03/2026 (Agnello, Nicholas) [Entered: 07/31/2026 04:24 PM]
July 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellee shall file, on or before August 3, 2026, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue identified in the courts order of July 9, 2026. JXK [6] [7542545] [26-2423] (PS) [Entered: 07/24/2026 02:18 PM]
July 24, 2026 Filing 5 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [5] [7542346] [26-2423] (CAG) [Entered: 07/24/2026 09:41 AM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Bataski Bailey. [4] [7542292] [26-2423]--[Edited 07/24/2026 by LJ to reflect correct filing type.] (Bailey, Bataski) [Entered: 07/23/2026 11:37 PM]
July 22, 2026 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Bataski D. Bailey. [3] [7541717] [26-2423] (JR) [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:57 AM]
July 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before July 23, 2026, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7538757] [2] [7538757] [26-2423] (PS) [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:13 AM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/21/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/21/2026 for Appellant Bataski D. Bailey. [1] [7538452] [26-2423] (PS) [Entered: 07/08/2026 01:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bataski Bailey v. Cenlar FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CENLAR FSB, incorrectly named as CENLAR AGENCY, INC.
Represented By: Nicholas S. Agnello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BATASKI BAILEY
Represented By: Bataski Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?