Omarrian Jones v. M. Henze, et al
| OMARRIAN JONES |
| M. HENZE, DOCTOR VELAPINTO, STEVEN BOWMAN, Doctor, JON LOFTUS and LISA WEITKAMP |
| 26-2452 |
| July 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER re: Motion for schedule request. [ # 14 ] To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time, any transcript information sheet is due by September 21, 2026. The clerk will send the appellant a transcript information sheet form and a copy of the courts public docket. [15] [7549532] SCR [26-2452] (CG) [Entered: 08/21/2026 09:39 AM]
|
| Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones for schedule request. (Forwarded from the District Court). [14] [7549452] [26-2452] (CAG) [Entered: 08/20/2026 04:33 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER re: Motion. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellants overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement is due by September 10, 2026. [ # 12 ] CDH [13] [7549201] [26-2452] (HTP) [Entered: 08/20/2026 10:41 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones to extend time to file docketing statement. [12] [7549047] [26-2452] (EHF) [Entered: 08/19/2026 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed prisoner trust fund account statement by Appellant Omarrian Jones. [11] [7546627] [26-2452] (NHV) [Entered: 08/11/2026 08:52 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: 1. Motion for court to keep promise, filed on 8/5/2026. 2. Motion for appointment of counsel, filed on 8/5/2026. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks appointment of counsel, the request is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated July 10, 2026. A review of the district courts docket shows that no appellees nor attorney for the appellees filed an appearance in the district court before the district court entered its final order and judgment. Because no appellees or counsel for the appellees were served by the district court or made an appearance in that court, there are no appellees involved in this appeal. [ # 9 ] [10] [7545832] CDH [26-2452] (FP) [Entered: 08/06/2026 01:45 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones for appointment of counsel. [9] [7545599] [26-2452] (DAB) [Entered: 08/05/2026 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones for court to keep promise of Judge Hunt. [8] [7545598] [26-2452] (DAB) [Entered: 08/05/2026 04:15 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the courts docket shows that on July 27, 2026, the appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Further, on July 29, 2026, the clerk transferred the motion to the district court for consideration in the first instance. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time, IT IS ORDERED that the appellant shall file his overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by August 13, 2026. The clerk will send this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. In his docketing statement, the appellant should attempt to provide the information listed in the Pro Se Instructions, particularly the date of the judgment or order being challenged in this appeal. [7] [7543925] CDH [26-2452] (AP) [Entered: 07/29/2026 03:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [6] [7543890] JR [26-2452, 26-2533] (CG) [Entered: 07/29/2026 02:35 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones. [5] [7543138] [26-2452] (CAG) [Entered: 07/27/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Omarrian Jones in 26-2452, 26-2533 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7543134] [26-2452, 26-2533] (CAG) [Entered: 07/27/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7539425] [26-2452] (FP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: D.O.N. Gardner; Ms. Patel; Dr. Kvcera; [2] [7539424] [26-2452] (FP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 07/24/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Omarrian Jones by 07/17/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/10/2026. [1] [7539421] [26-2452] (FP) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
