James Cross v. Tracy Plaskey, et al
| JAMES CROSS |
| TRACY PLASKEY, AMBER HUCK, NICOLE SCHWALLER, MARK PUTERBAUGH, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 3 |
| 26-2456 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 9 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 10/23/2026 for James Cross. Appellees' brief due on or before 11/23/2026 for Amber Huck, Tracy Plaskey, Mark Puterbaugh and Nicole Schwaller. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/14/2026 for Appellant James Cross. CDH [10] [7547758] [26-2456] (SCB) [Entered: 08/14/2026 11:12 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Motion filed by Appellant James Cross to extend time to file appellant brief. [9] [7547578] [26-2456] (Jain, Amit) [Entered: 08/13/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Amit Jain for Appellant James Cross. [8] [7547532] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2456]--[Docket updated 08/13/2026 by JR to add Attorney Jain.] (Jain, Amit) [Entered: 08/13/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jody Schmelzer for Appellees Amber Huck, Tracy Plaskey, Mark Puterbaugh and Nicole Schwaller. [7] [7547065] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [26-2456]--[Docket updated 08/13/2026 by JR to substitute Attorney Schmelzer for Attorney Toulouse.] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 08/12/2026 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires the lead attorney and any attorney who intends to present oral argument be admitted to practice in this court. The lead attorney for each party represented by counsel must apply for admission to practice in this court by the later of: (a) 30 days from the docketing of the matter in this court; or (b) 15 days from being retained or appointed as counsel. An attorney who intends to present oral argument must apply for admission to practice in this court before the filing of the appellee's brief. Our records indicate Attorney Pauline Toulouse for Appellees Mark Puterbaugh, Tracy Plaskey, Amber Huck and Nicole Schwaller has not been admitted to practice in this court as of this date. The "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit" form can be found at: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/applctn.pdf. The filing of the completed application must be accomplished via the CM/ECF filing system. [6] [7541098] [26-2456] (LJ) [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant James Cross. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7540912] [26-2456] (Grass, Gary) [Entered: 07/20/2026 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant James Cross. [4] [7540854] [26-2456] (Grass, Gary) [Entered: 07/18/2026 01:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Gary Grass for Appellant James Cross. [3] [7540853] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2456] [3] [7540853] [26-2456]--[Edited 07/20/2026 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Grass, Gary) [Entered: 07/18/2026 01:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees John Doe 1 and John Doe 3, per District Court docket. [2] [7539689] [26-2456] (FP) [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. Fee Paid. Transcript information sheet due by 07/27/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James Cross by 07/20/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 08/24/2026 for James Cross. [1] [7539672] [26-2456] (FP) [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
