Philip Okey v. Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission, et al
Plaintiff: PHILIP SCOTT OKEY
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CARL MARK SIMION, TRADEMARK CUSTOM HOMES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-3, Indianapolis/Marion County Officials
Case Number: 26-2461
Filed: July 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7539773] d [3] [7539773] [26-2461] (FP) [Entered: 07/14/2026 01:23 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee John Does 1-3, per District Court docket. [2] [7539770] [26-2461] (FP) [Entered: 07/14/2026 01:21 PM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 07/27/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Philip Scott Okey by 07/16/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/27/2026 for Appellant Philip Scott Okey. [1] [7539763] [26-2461] (FP) [Entered: 07/14/2026 01:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Philip Okey v. Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILIP SCOTT OKEY
Represented By: Philip Scott Okey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Represented By: Mathew M. Rayman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Represented By: Mathew M. Rayman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARL MARK SIMION
Represented By: Conor L. Delehanty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRADEMARK CUSTOM HOMES, INC.
Represented By: Conor L. Delehanty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-3, Indianapolis/Marion County Officials
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?