Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Todd Rokita
| INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES INC. |
| TODD ROKITA, in his official capacity as the Indiana Attorney General |
| 26-2511 |
| July 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney David M. Foster for Appellee Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.. [5] [7541865] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2511] (Foster, David) [Entered: 07/22/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jessica L. Ellsworth for Appellee Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. [4] [7541861] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2511]--[Edited 07/22/2026 by PS - docket updated to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Ellsworth, Jessica) [Entered: 07/22/2026 03:40 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant shall file an amended docketing statement that provides a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before July 29, 2026. (See order for further details) JXK [3] [7541699] [26-2511, 26-2512] (PS) [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's consolidated brief due on or before 08/31/2026 for Todd Rokita. Appellees' briefs due on or before 09/30/2026 for Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/21/2026 for Appellant Todd Rokita. A review of the short records reveals that these appeals involve more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to avoid unnecessary duplication by filing a joint brief or a joint appendix or by adopting parts of a co-appellees brief. Duplicative briefing will be stricken and may result in disciplinary sanctions against counsel. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). JXK [2] [7541641] [26-2511, 26-2512] (PS) [Entered: 07/22/2026 10:18 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/04/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 08/31/2026 for Todd Rokita. [1] [7541479] [26-2511] (PS) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Todd Rokita | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES INC. | |
| Represented By: | Kandi Kilkelly Hidde |
| Represented By: | David M. Foster |
| Represented By: | Jessica Lynn Ellsworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TODD ROKITA, in his official capacity as the Indiana Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | James A. Barta |
| Represented By: | Gene C. Schaerr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
