Keith Hoglund v. Jason Smiley
| JASON SMILEY, Warden |
| KEITH HOGLUND |
| 26-2603 |
| August 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Charles A. Asher for Applicant Keith Hoglund. [2] [7545357] [26-2603] (PS) [Entered: 08/05/2026 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for an order authorizing the District Court to consider a second or successive petition for collateral review under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 docketed. [1] [7545355] [26-2603] (PS) [Entered: 08/05/2026 09:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Keith Hoglund v. Jason Smiley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Applicant: KEITH HOGLUND | |
| Represented By: | John Lawrence Tompkins |
| Represented By: | Charles A. Asher |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JASON SMILEY, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin M. L. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
