Concepcion Del Rosario Urias Montano, et al v. Todd W. Blanche
| CONCEPCION DEL ROSARIO URIAS MONTANO and H. N. C. U., a minor |
| TODD W. BLANCHE, Attorney General of the United States |
| 26-2716 |
| August 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of fee payment. Fee Amount: $600.00 Receipt Number: A07-49116-905. [5] [7549609] [26-2716] (MAN) [Entered: 08/21/2026 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Anthony C. Payne for Respondent Todd W. Blanche. [4] [7549298] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2716]--[Edited 08/20/2026 by PS - docket updated to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Payne, Anthony) [Entered: 08/20/2026 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Raya Jarawan for Respondent Todd W. Blanche. [3] [7549296] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2716]--[Edited 08/20/2026 by PS - docket updated to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Jarawan, Raya) [Entered: 08/20/2026 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Maria T. Baldini-Potermin for Petitioners Concepcion Del Rosario Urias Montano and H. N. C. U. [2] [7549225] [26-2716] (PS) [Entered: 08/20/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Review docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). Fee due. Agency record or certified list due by 09/29/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/03/2026 for Petitioners H. N. C. U. and Concepcion Del Rosario Urias Montano. [1] [7549216] [26-2716] (PS) [Entered: 08/20/2026 10:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
