Amber Tinsley v. It Takes a Village
| AMBER TINSLEY |
| IT TAKES A VILLAGE |
| 26-2747 |
| August 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7550528] [26-2747] (CFK) [Entered: 08/25/2026 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Amber Tinsley by 08/31/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 09/08/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/08/2026 for Appellant Amber Tinsley. [1] [7550518] [26-2747] (CFK) [Entered: 08/25/2026 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Amber Tinsley v. It Takes a Village | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AMBER TINSLEY | |
| Represented By: | Amber Tinsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: IT TAKES A VILLAGE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
