Kathleen Davis v. Group 2029, Inc., et al
| KATHLEEN DAVIS |
| GROUP 2029, INC., doing business as BURGER KING and MARUTI GAGAN MANAGEMENT LLC, doing business as BURGER KING |
| 26-2789 |
| August 31, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/19/2026 for Kathleen Davis. Appellees' brief due on or before 11/18/2026 for Group 2029, Inc. and Maruti Gagan Management LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/09/2026 for Appellant Kathleen Davis. RJS [7552332] [26-2789] (CFK) [Entered: 09/01/2026 03:44 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Friday, September 18, 2026 at 9:30a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS [3] [7552330] [26-2789] (CFK) [Entered: 09/01/2026 03:41 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall file an amended docketing statement that provides a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before September 8, 2026. (See order for further details) JXK [2] [7551855] [26-2789] (PS) [Entered: 08/31/2026 02:39 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 09/14/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/13/2026 for Kathleen Davis. [1] [7551794] [26-2789] (SCB) [Entered: 08/31/2026 12:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
