Ey Lao v. USA
Petitioner: EY LAO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-2805
Filed: September 1, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2026 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Ey Lao. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-1111, 19-3500 [7] [7553898] [26-2805] (Tutt, Andrew) [Entered: 09/08/2026 10:48 PM]
September 8, 2026 Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Ey Lao. [6] [7553890] [26-2805] (Tutt, Andrew) [Entered: 09/08/2026 05:31 PM]
September 8, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires the lead attorney and any attorney who intends to present oral argument be admitted to practice in this court. The lead attorney for each party represented by counsel must apply for admission to practice in this court by the later of: (a) 30 days from the docketing of the matter in this court; or (b) 15 days from being retained or appointed as counsel. An attorney who intends to present oral argument must apply for admission to practice in this court before the filing of the appellee's brief. Our records indicate Attorney Stanton Jones for Appellant Ey Lao has not been admitted to practice in this court as of this date. The "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit" form can be found at: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/applctn.pdf. The filing of the completed application must be accomplished via the CM/ECF filing system. [5] [7553695] [26-2805] (LJ) [Entered: 09/08/2026 02:26 PM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Stanton Jones for Appellant Ey Lao. [4] [7553061] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2805]--[Edited 09/04/2026 by FP to reflect that atty. Jones is added to the docket.] (Jones, R.) [Entered: 09/03/2026 05:06 PM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [3] [7552986] [26-2805] (CAG) [Entered: 09/03/2026 03:11 PM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Andrew T. Tutt for Appellant Ey Lao. [2] [7552980] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [26-2805]--[Docket updated 09/03/2026 by JR to add Attorney Tutt.] (Tutt, Andrew) [Entered: 09/03/2026 03:02 PM]
September 1, 2026 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 07/10/2026. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ey Lao by 09/08/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/15/2026 for Appellant Ey Lao. Transcript information sheet due by 09/15/2026. [1] [7552161] [26-2805] (HTP) [Entered: 09/01/2026 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ey Lao v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EY LAO
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Andrew Tutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jonathan H. Koenig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?