Liddell Lacy v. Village of Maywood, et al
| LIDDELL LACY |
| VILLAGE OF MAYWOOD, SEAN EARLEY, Officer, CARLOS PATTERSON, Officer and DARYL FAIRLEY, Officer |
| 26-2847 |
| September 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record suggests that the order appealed from may not yet be a final decision within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291. A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely motion under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district courts civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Proceedings in this appeal are SUSPENDED pending the district court's resolution of the motion to alter or amend. If a party contends that this appeal should not be suspended, then that party should file a brief memorandum on or before September 23, 2026, stating why suspension is not appropriate. Appellant shall file a status report within seven days of a ruling on the motion to alter or amend, or on or shortly before October 9, 2026, if no order has yet issued. (See order for further details). JXK [2] [2] [7554184] [26-2847] (HTP) [Entered: 09/09/2026 02:47 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Liddell Lacy by 09/15/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 09/23/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/19/2026 for Liddell Lacy. [1] [7554057] [26-2847] (SCB) [Entered: 09/09/2026 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
