Human Rights Defense Center v. Latoya Hughes
| HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER |
| LATOYA HUGHES, in her official capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections |
| 26-2880 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Latoya Hughes by 09/18/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 09/28/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/26/2026 for Latoya Hughes. [1] [7555258] [26-2880] (SCB) [Entered: 09/14/2026 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Human Rights Defense Center v. Latoya Hughes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Maurice T. Baynard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LATOYA HUGHES, in her official capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Sarah H. Newman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
