Illinois Bankers Association, et al v. Kwame Raoul
| ILLINOIS BANKERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS and ILLINOIS CREDIT UNION LEAGUE |
| KWAME RAOUL, in his official capacity as Illinois Attorney General |
| 26-3106 |
| October 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER Re: Motion of Plaintiffs-Appellees-Croos-Appellants to Expedite Appeal. These appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. Further, the motion is GRANTED. Briefing will proceed as follows: 1. The Attorney General's brief is due no later than November 23, 2026. 2. Plaintiffs' brief is due no later than December 21, 2026. 3. The Attorney General's reply brief, if any, is due no later than January 11, 2027. No extensions of time will be granted. The parties principal briefs shall not exceed 9,000 words, and the reply brief shall not exceed 4,000 words. Oral argument in this matter will be held before the end of February 2027, and will be scheduled by separate court order. [ # 7563122-2 ] MTJ [2] [7563444] [26-3082, 26-3106] (AD) [Entered: 10/16/2026 10:51 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/28/2026. Appellants' brief due on or before 11/23/2026 for America's Credit Unions, American Bankers Association, Illinois Bankers Association and Illinois Credit Union League. [1] [7563148] [26-3106] (PS) [Entered: 10/15/2026 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
