Brandyn Blacharski v. Rodney Laureys
Plaintiff: BRANDYN BLACHARSKI
Defendant: RODNEY G. LAUREYS, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Task Force Officer
Case Number: 26-3134
Filed: October 19, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Re: Memorandum In Support of Notice of Appeal. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the courts docket shows that on October 19, 2026, the appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Further, on October 20, 2026, the clerk transferred the motion to the district court for consideration in the first instance. Accordingly, any relief requested in the appellants memorandum is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated October 19, 2026. Should this appeal proceed to briefing, the appellant may make any arguments he believes have merit in his opening brief. [ # 3 ] [6] [7564375] CDH [26-3134] (AD) [Entered: 10/20/2026 02:33 PM]
October 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [5] [7564276] CDH [26-3134] (CG) [Entered: 10/20/2026 11:57 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Brandyn Blacharski to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7564220] [26-3134] (SCB) [Entered: 10/20/2026 11:19 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Brandyn Blacharski Memorandum in Support of Notice of Appeal. [3] [7564217] [26-3134] (SCB) [Entered: 10/20/2026 11:17 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7563888] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [26-3134] (CFK) [Entered: 10/19/2026 12:32 PM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 1 State prisoner's federal civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Brandyn Blacharski by 10/23/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/18/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 11/02/2026. [1] [7563881] [26-3134] (CFK) [Entered: 10/19/2026 12:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brandyn Blacharski v. Rodney Laureys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRANDYN BLACHARSKI
Represented By: Brandyn Blacharski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RODNEY G. LAUREYS, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Task Force Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?