Charlie Booker v. Catherine Larry, et al
| CHARLIE BOOKER |
| CATHERINE LARRY, Warden, JOHN BENSON, Assistant Warden, JOHN BERGHOLTZ, Assistant Warden, MICHELLE MILLER, Health Care Administrator and JOHN D. CRUDUP, Office Administration |
| 26-3175 |
| October 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7564994] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [26-3175] (CFK) [Entered: 10/22/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: John Ugwuegbu, Jane Kolenchery, John Kelder, Jane Racine, John Nwaru, John T. Patel, Jane McClain, Jane Jade, and John Monaco. [2] [7564992] [26-3175] (CFK) [Entered: 10/22/2026 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Charlie Booker by 10/28/2026. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/23/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 11/05/2026. [1] [7564988] [26-3175] (CFK) [Entered: 10/22/2026 12:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
