USA v. Edmund Singleton
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| EDMUND SINGLETON |
| 26-3272 |
| November 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Edmund Singleton by 11/09/2026. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/14/2026 for Edmund Singleton. Motion to Withdraw or to Appoint Counsel pursuant to Circuit Rule 46.1 due for Appellant Edmund Singleton by 11/17/2026. Transcript information sheet due by 11/17/2026. [1] [7567657] [26-3272] (SCB) [Entered: 11/03/2026 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Edmund Singleton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EDMUND SINGLETON | |
| Represented By: | Quinn A. Michaelis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Elie Zenner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
