Antonio Armour v. USA
| ANTONIO C. ARMOUR |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3284 |
| November 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 11/06/2024. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 11/18/2026. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Antonio C. Armour by 11/06/2026. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/18/2026 for Appellant Antonio C. Armour. [1] [7568225] [26-3284] (FP) [Entered: 11/05/2026 11:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Antonio Armour v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Joseph P. Falvey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANTONIO C. ARMOUR | |
| Represented By: | Antonio C. Armour |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
