Koken, et al v. First Alliance Corp, et al
| RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS |
| FIRST ALLIANCE CORPORATION, FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY and FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD. |
| M. DIANE KOKEN, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company (In Liquidation) |
| 02-56776 |
| October 22, 2002 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NO ORIGINAL RECORD (Sefarian, Steve) [Entered: 12/03/2004 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed parties stipulation & order (Deputy Clerk, RGA) (CONFAT) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, thee appeals are voluntarly DISMISSED. FRAP 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. A certified copy of this orde shall serve as the mandate of this crt. dismissing action pursuant to FRAP 42(b). A copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court. ( Procedurally Terminated Without Judicial Action; F.R.A.P. 42. ) [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 05/02/2003 07:21 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed parties (faxed) stipulation of dismissal for both Reliance & the Insurance Commisisoner's appeals; served on 4/25/03 (CONFAT ) (Stipulation sent by CONFAT) [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 05/05/2003 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order CONFATT ( RGA) These appeals are selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. During the time the appeals remain in the Program, all procedural matters should be brought to the attn of the Circ Mediator. The crt is informed that the parties have reached a tentative settlement of their dispute. Within 60 days of the filing date of this order, the parties shall file either a mtn or a stipulation to dismiss this matter pursuant to FRAP 42(b)), or shall contact the Circ Mediator. A copy of any mtn or stipulation to dismiss shall be served on the Circ Mediator at the Circ Mediation Office in SF. The briefing schedule previously sete by the crt is VACATED. [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 02/26/2003 07:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order CONFATT ( RGA) The assessment conf is RESCHEDULED to 2/24/03 at 11:00 a.m. PST. 11:00 by telephone. [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 12/23/2002 07:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 Recd (faxed) notice of substitution of csl of Robert S. Schulman for aplt M. Diane Koken; (Withdrew as counsel: [02-56776] (MF) [Entered: 12/23/2002 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order CONFATT ( vs) Case referred to Confatt for assessment conference only. Conference to be on 1/8/03 at 2:00 p.m. PST. By telephone (y/n): y. The brfg schedule is as follows: appellants' brief, excerpts of record are due 2/18/03; aples' brf is due 3/19/03; the opt rpy brf is due 14 days..... [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 12/10/2002 07:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Robert S. Schulman for Appellant M. Diane Koken Civil Appeals Docketing Statement served on 10/9/02 (to CONFATT) [02-56776] [02-56776] (PG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed representation statement by Robert S. Schuman for Intervenor-Appellant M. Diane Koken, served on 10/9/02 (CASEFILE) [02-56776] (PG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. CADS SENT (Y/N): N. setting schedule as follows: appellant's designation of RT is due 10/21/02; appellee's designation of RT is due 10/31/02,, ; appellant shall order transcript by 11/12/02; court reporter shall file transcript in DC by 12/11/02; certificate of record shall be filed by 12/18/02 ; appellant's opening brief is due 1/27/03; appellees' brief is due 2/26/03,, ; appellants' reply brief is due 3/12/03; [02-56776] (PG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
