Reliance Ins. Co. Il v. First Alliance Corp, et al
Appellant: RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
Counter Claimant: FIRST ALLIANCE CORPORATION, FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY and FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD.
Case Number: 02-56777
Filed: October 22, 2002
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2003 Filing 20 Filed parties stipulation & order (Deputy Clerk, RGA) (CONFAT) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, thee appeals are voluntarly DISMISSED. FRAP 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. A certified copy of this orde shall serve as the mandate of this crt. dismissing action pursuant to FRAP 42(b). A copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court. ( Procedurally Terminated Without Judicial Action; F.R.A.P. 42. ) [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 05/02/2003 07:21 AM]
April 28, 2003 Filing 18 Filed parties' stipulation of dismissal , served on 4/25/03 CONFAT. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 04/29/2003 12:02 PM]
April 25, 2003 Filing 19 Filed Parties' stipulation to dismiss, served on 4/25/03 CONFAT. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 04/30/2003 11:07 AM]
February 26, 2003 Filing 17 Filed order CONFATT ( RGA) These appeals are selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. During the time the appeals remain in the Program, all procedural matters should be brought to the attn of the Circ Mediator. The crt is informed that the parties have reached a tentative settlement of their dispute. Within 60 days of the filing date of this order, the parties shall file either a mtn or a stipulation to dismiss this matter pursuant to FRAP 42(b)), or shall contact the Circ Mediator. A copy of any mtn or stipulation to dismiss shall be served on the Circ Mediator at the Circ Mediation Office in SF. The briefing schedule previously sete by the crt is VACATED. [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 02/26/2003 07:57 AM]
February 18, 2003 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Reliance Ins. Co. Il's stipulation and proposed order to stay appeal served on 2/14/03 MOATT via PROMO. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 02/19/2003 04:09 PM]
December 23, 2002 Filing 14 Filed order MOATT ( TK) Aplt has requested a 40-day extension of time to respond to this court's 11/22/02 order to show cause because the parties to this appeal are involved in settlement negotitations. Aplt's request is granted, and the response is now due 3/3/03. If aplt elects to show cause, aples may respond within 5 days after service of aplt's memo. If aplt does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing remains suspended pending further order of the court. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 12/23/2002 11:41 AM]
December 23, 2002 Filing 13 Filed order CONFATT ( RGA) The assessment conf is RESCHEDULED to 2/24/03 at 11:00 a.m. PST. 11:00 by telephone. [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 12/23/2002 07:29 AM]
December 12, 2002 Filing 12 Filed order MOATT ( TK) Aplt's oral request for an extension of time to respond to this court's 11/22/02 order to show cause is granted. Aplt's response is now due 12/20/02. If Aplt elects to show cause, aples may respond within 5 days after service of aplt's memo. If aplt does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 12/12/2002 08:36 AM]
December 10, 2002 Filing 10 Filed order CONFATT ( vs) Case referred to Confatt for assessment conference only. Conference to be on 1/8/03 at 2:00 p.m. PST. By telephone (y/n): y. The brfg schedule is as follows: appellants' brief, excerpts of record are due 2/18/03; aples' brf is due 3/19/03; the opt rpy brf is due 14 days..... [02-56776, 02-56777] (MF) [Entered: 12/10/2002 07:19 AM]
November 22, 2002 Filing 9 Filed order MOATT ( TK) A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the appeal is not taken from a final appealable order. Within 14 days of the filing date of this order, aplt shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appel or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If aplt elects to show cause, appellees may respond within 10 days after service of aplt's memo. If aplt does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pupsuant to 9th cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 11/22/2002 09:26 AM]
October 29, 2002 Filing 6 Filed Dawn Bullock in 02-56777's notice of order of transcript. RT ordered 10/21/02; Expected payment date: 10/23/02 No. of pages: n/a ; Expected completion: n/a [02-56777] (KKW) [Entered: 10/29/2002 01:19 PM]
October 29, 2002 Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re payment of docket fee. ( Date: 10/23/02) [02-56777] (BG) [Entered: 10/29/2002 09:12 AM]
October 22, 2002 Filing 4 Filed Attorney for Appellant Civil Appeals Docketing Statement served on 10/11/02 (to CONFATT) [02-56777] [02-56777] (BG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 12:02 PM]
October 22, 2002 Filing 3 Filed notice of representation of David R. Koch for Appellant. [02-56777] (BG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 12:00 PM]
October 22, 2002 Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. CADS SENT (Y/N): n. setting schedule as follows: Fee payment is due 11/5/02; appellant's designation of RT is due 10/21/02; appellee's designation of RT is due 10/31/02; appellant shall order transcript by 11/12/02; court reporter shall file transcript in DC by 12/11/02; certificate of record shall be filed by 12/18/02; appellant's opening brief is due 1/27/03; appellees' brief is due 2/26/03; appellants' reply brief is due 3/12/03; [02-56777] (BG) [Entered: 10/22/2002 11:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reliance Ins. Co. Il v. First Alliance Corp, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
Represented By: David R. Koch Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: FIRST ALLIANCE CORPORATION
Represented By: Joseph Chairez
Represented By: William N. Lobel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY
Represented By: Joseph Chairez
Represented By: William N. Lobel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: FIRST ALLIANCE MORTGAGE COMPANY LTD.
Represented By: Joseph Chairez
Represented By: William N. Lobel Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?